In the media

25 June 2020

Quandary over future European supervisor, stakeholders give their opinions

This article has been published by Agence Europe.  It is about our 10 June ‘EU’s fight against financial crime: Diving into the Anti-Money Laundering Action plan’ online webinar organised by Accountancy Europe, in cooperation with the European Contact Group and Transparency International.

Full article here:

A European anti-money laundering supervisor, yes — but which one? This is the question that several stakeholders tried to answer on Wednesday 10 June during an online event organised by Accountancy Europe, in cooperation with the European Contact Group and Transparency International.

In its action plan to strengthen the fight against money laundering presented at the beginning of May (see EUROPE B12482A8), the European Commission confirmed its intention to present proposals to set up a European supervisor in the first quarter of 2021, while remaining vague about its nature and functions.

According to Sébastien de Brouwer of the European Banking Federation, the “European Banking Authority (EBA) could and should certainly play a role”, subject to certain changes.

Today, it looks more like a network of regulators” than a European money laundering watchdog, he admitted, also pointing out its lack of resources.

Therefore, in his view, other solutions will have to be found, be it to increase the EBA’s resources, to strengthen its competences, or to focus on another authority. In this respect, some in the banking sector have called for the European Central Bank (ECB) to take on this role, he said, although the ECB seems to be refusing to do so.

In any case, before taking a decision, the Commission will first have to decide whether it wants an authority that supervises only banks or a broader range of entities, he pointed out.

According to Angela Foyle of Accountancy Europe, a set of criteria could be developed, for example, to determine which entities pose a risk to the EU in terms of money laundering and, therefore, which entities should be subject to such supervision.

For her part, Maira Martini, an expert at Transparency International, argued for the establishment of a new independent body with direct supervisory powers that could also sanction Member States in the event of an infringement.

For more, please read here

Source: Agence Europe 

Related content

Consultation responseEc’s public consultation on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

28 October 2020

UpdateAudit Policy

23 October 2020

BlogReliable non-financial information to progress sustainable finance

21 October 2020

EventMembers’ Webinar Series

21 October 2020

UpdateSustainable Finance

16 October 2020

Consultation responseEC’s public consultation on the Energy Tax Directive

15 October 2020

EventImplementing ESEF

12 October 2020

UpdateTax Policy

9 October 2020

NewsAccountancy Europe welcomes EU sustainable corporate governance initiative

8 October 2020

Consultation responseEC roadmap on sustainable corporate governance

8 October 2020

Consultation responseEC’s consultation on the establishment of an EU Green Bond Standard. 

5 October 2020

Podcast Accountants & the fight against financial crime (Part 2)

2 October 2020

UpdateTax Policy

25 September 2020

UpdateSME Update

24 September 2020

NewsAccountancy Europe welcomes cooperation by sustainability reporting bodies

23 September 2020

UpdateAudit Policy

21 September 2020

Consultation responseEC’s roadmap on obligation for companies to publish non-financial information

18 September 2020

Podcast The EU & the fight against financial crime (Part 1)

18 September 2020

UpdateTax Policy

11 September 2020

Consultation responseEC’s consultation on the VAT scheme for travel agents

2 September 2020

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required
Would you like to subscribe to our newsletter?
On which topics would you like to receive news?