In the media

25 June 2020

Quandary over future European supervisor, stakeholders give their opinions

This article has been published by Agence Europe.  It is about our 10 June ‘EU’s fight against financial crime: Diving into the Anti-Money Laundering Action plan’ online webinar organised by Accountancy Europe, in cooperation with the European Contact Group and Transparency International.

Full article here:

A European anti-money laundering supervisor, yes — but which one? This is the question that several stakeholders tried to answer on Wednesday 10 June during an online event organised by Accountancy Europe, in cooperation with the European Contact Group and Transparency International.

In its action plan to strengthen the fight against money laundering presented at the beginning of May (see EUROPE B12482A8), the European Commission confirmed its intention to present proposals to set up a European supervisor in the first quarter of 2021, while remaining vague about its nature and functions.

According to Sébastien de Brouwer of the European Banking Federation, the “European Banking Authority (EBA) could and should certainly play a role”, subject to certain changes.

Today, it looks more like a network of regulators” than a European money laundering watchdog, he admitted, also pointing out its lack of resources.

Therefore, in his view, other solutions will have to be found, be it to increase the EBA’s resources, to strengthen its competences, or to focus on another authority. In this respect, some in the banking sector have called for the European Central Bank (ECB) to take on this role, he said, although the ECB seems to be refusing to do so.

In any case, before taking a decision, the Commission will first have to decide whether it wants an authority that supervises only banks or a broader range of entities, he pointed out.

According to Angela Foyle of Accountancy Europe, a set of criteria could be developed, for example, to determine which entities pose a risk to the EU in terms of money laundering and, therefore, which entities should be subject to such supervision.

For her part, Maira Martini, an expert at Transparency International, argued for the establishment of a new independent body with direct supervisory powers that could also sanction Member States in the event of an infringement.

For more, please read here

Source: Agence Europe 

Related content

EventImplementing ESEF

12 October 2020

Blog4 steps to a sustainable recovery from Covid-19

6 August 2020

Consultation responseEC’s consultation on AML action plan

16 July 2020

Consultation responseEC’s consultation on the renewed sustainable finance strategy

15 July 2020

UpdateAudit Policy

13 July 2020

UpdateTax Policy

10 July 2020

NewsEuropean tax professionals call for better tax governance

10 July 2020

UpdateTechnology

9 July 2020

UpdateSME Update

3 July 2020

NewsEquity: the key to unlocking a sustainable economic recovery

2 July 2020

EventEquity: the key to unlocking a sustainable economic recovery

2 July 2020

UpdateSustainable Finance

30 June 2020

EventEurope’s economic recovery from COVID 19

30 June 2020

UpdateTax Policy

26 June 2020

UpdateAudit Policy

23 June 2020

NewsJoint statement on the revision of the non-financial reporting directive in the context of Covid-19

23 June 2020

NewsAccountancy Europe leads the non-financial reporting debate

17 June 2020

Consultation responseEC’s consultation on the Non-Financial Reporting Directive revision

15 June 2020

Podcast Europe and the coronavirus crisis: what’s next?

12 June 2020

UpdateTax Policy

12 June 2020

Sign up for our newsletter