News

24 February 2022

EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: a global milestone that will need further clarity Statement

Accountancy Europe welcomes the much-expected proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Commission shows the necessary leadership by being the first policymaker in the world to take concrete initiative and we call on world leaders to follow this example.

We are still analysing the proposed Directive which represents significant and much needed steps toward a sustainable business system. Some will see the glass half empty and others half full, and the European Parliament and the Council will need to improve clarity on certain aspects of the proposal. We stand ready to share our expertise to make this proposal operational and contribute to its success.

At this stage, we would like to share the following points on the proposed Directive:

Business’ impacts take place throughout the entire value chain

Clarify the concept of ‘established business relationships’

To measure their impact throughout their entire value chain, companies will need more clarity on the extent of their responsibility and the concept of ‘established business relationships’ that seems to underpin the depth of the due diligence obligation.

Information from suppliers

Companies with parts of their supply chain outside of the EU will need access to reliable information on their suppliers. Clarity and legal certainty will be essential for directors and assurance practitioners.

We support the accompanying measures that Article 14 proposes e.g. websites, portals, and joint stakeholders’ initiatives. We also encourage the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to provide specific guidance and support to companies to fulfil their due diligence obligations.

Secure a level playing field

We support the Commission’s efforts to include key third country companies in the proposal and create a level playing field for EU businesses. Value chains are global, and companies integrating sustainability in their operations should not face unfair competition from companies (third country or EU) who do not take this responsibility.

Reliable due diligence will require external verification

Businesses need to assess their processes and internal controls so they can address the adverse impacts in their own operations and supply chains. Due diligence verification by independent third parties (be it the statutory auditor or another service provider) will be crucial to strengthen stakeholders’ confidence in this process.

Accountancy Europe has recently published a paper Supply Chain Sustainability Assessment in cooperation with EGIAN which provides examples of supply chain assurance practices by smaller accountancy firms.

The proposed Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Green Bonds proposals require mandatory external verification and assurance. It would be preferable that the different assurance requirements are high-quality and consistent and provided by independent competent professionals.

Consistency with the CSRD

We support the Commission’s intention to align the Due Diligence proposal with the CSRD. The two initiatives are closely interrelated.

We note that the scope and implementation dates of the two directives are significantly different, and we fear that this may cause implementation difficulties and costs.

Directors need clarity on their duty of care

Human rights, environmental and climate objectives need to be integrated into corporate decisions. We believe it is in directors’ interest to have clarity and legal certainty regarding their duties of care. While the principle-based approach of Article 25 (Directors’ duty of care) and 26 (Setting up and overseeing due diligence) on directors’ duty of care is useful, corporate directors may need clearer indications.

Tools and standards to help companies assess their sustainability decisions are not yet fully developed and Article 25 may still prove difficult to put in practice. References to, and consistency with, the EU Taxonomy and the CSRD need to be more precise.

Boards play a crucial role. The board’s composition and directors’ experience, competences and continued professional development on sustainability matters will be instrumental to help meet the directive’s objectives.

Support affected SMEs

We support the Commission’s initiative to develop guidelines and supporting mechanisms for SMEs that are affected along supply chains. These guidelines will need to be targeted and clear. We expect the Commission to follow the implementation procedure closely and keep up the dialogue with those affected to ensure supporting mechanisms correspond to their needs.

Combatting climate change requires drastic and concrete measures

We believe that fighting climate change requires radical measures and incentives. Therefore, we stand behind the Commission’s proposal to connect directors’ remuneration with sustainability targets (Art 15.3). We all have a collective responsibility to meet the Paris agreement. Companies have an important role to play in this respect, however the parties to the Agreement – governments – have a prime responsibility.

Read the full statement below

Related content

Consultation responseEC’s corporate sustainability due diligence proposal

20 May 2022

PublicationSupply chain sustainability assessment

28 January 2022

Consultation responseEC’s Consultation document proposal for an initiative on sustainable corporate governance

8 February 2021

NewsAccountancy Europe welcomes EU sustainable corporate governance initiative

8 October 2020

UpdateSustainability

26 January 2023

BlogCollaboration – the key to high-quality sustainability education framework for accountants

23 January 2023

Consultation responseIPSASB’s exposure draft 83, reporting sustainability program information

17 January 2023

NewsJoint statement on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

8 December 2022

EventReducing corporate fraud risk: European perspectives

8 December 2022

PublicationAudit committees’ role in fighting fraud – Recommendations

30 November 2022

UpdateSustainability

25 November 2022

PublicationFAQs: all you need to know about the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

23 November 2022

NewsEFRAG SRB issues first set of draft EU Sustainability Reporting Standards

23 November 2022

PublicationComparing European corporate governance models

17 November 2022

NewsNew SRB chair to further European sustainability reporting agenda

16 November 2022

EventSMEs’ sustainable transition: how to support it?

15 November 2022

PublicationSustainability education

14 November 2022

UpdateSustainability

28 October 2022

NewsEC’s proposal to ban products made using forced labour

28 October 2022

EventSustainable tax system: towards a green future

25 October 2022

PublicationSustainable tax systems – environment

24 October 2022

Consultation responseOECD’s consultation on the review of the G20/OECD principles of corporate governance

21 October 2022

EventMembers’ Engagement Day

19 October 2022

Consultation responseIPSASB’S consultation on natural resources

18 October 2022

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required
Would you like to subscribe to our newsletter?
On which topics would you like to receive news?