Accountancy Europe welcomes the much-expected proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Commission shows the necessary leadership by being the first policymaker in the world to take concrete initiative and we call on world leaders to follow this example.
We are still analysing the proposed Directive which represents significant and much needed steps toward a sustainable business system. Some will see the glass half empty and others half full, and the European Parliament and the Council will need to improve clarity on certain aspects of the proposal. We stand ready to share our expertise to make this proposal operational and contribute to its success.
At this stage, we would like to share the following points on the proposed Directive:
Clarify the concept of ‘established business relationships’
To measure their impact throughout their entire value chain, companies will need more clarity on the extent of their responsibility and the concept of ‘established business relationships’ that seems to underpin the depth of the due diligence obligation.
Information from suppliers
Companies with parts of their supply chain outside of the EU will need access to reliable information on their suppliers. Clarity and legal certainty will be essential for directors and assurance practitioners.
We support the accompanying measures that Article 14 proposes e.g. websites, portals, and joint stakeholders’ initiatives. We also encourage the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to provide specific guidance and support to companies to fulfil their due diligence obligations.
We support the Commission’s efforts to include key third country companies in the proposal and create a level playing field for EU businesses. Value chains are global, and companies integrating sustainability in their operations should not face unfair competition from companies (third country or EU) who do not take this responsibility.
Businesses need to assess their processes and internal controls so they can address the adverse impacts in their own operations and supply chains. Due diligence verification by independent third parties (be it the statutory auditor or another service provider) will be crucial to strengthen stakeholders’ confidence in this process.
Accountancy Europe has recently published a paper Supply Chain Sustainability Assessment in cooperation with EGIAN which provides examples of supply chain assurance practices by smaller accountancy firms.
The proposed Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Green Bonds proposals require mandatory external verification and assurance. It would be preferable that the different assurance requirements are high-quality and consistent and provided by independent competent professionals.
We support the Commission’s intention to align the Due Diligence proposal with the CSRD. The two initiatives are closely interrelated.
We note that the scope and implementation dates of the two directives are significantly different, and we fear that this may cause implementation difficulties and costs.
Human rights, environmental and climate objectives need to be integrated into corporate decisions. We believe it is in directors’ interest to have clarity and legal certainty regarding their duties of care. While the principle-based approach of Article 25 (Directors’ duty of care) and 26 (Setting up and overseeing due diligence) on directors’ duty of care is useful, corporate directors may need clearer indications.
Tools and standards to help companies assess their sustainability decisions are not yet fully developed and Article 25 may still prove difficult to put in practice. References to, and consistency with, the EU Taxonomy and the CSRD need to be more precise.
Boards play a crucial role. The board’s composition and directors’ experience, competences and continued professional development on sustainability matters will be instrumental to help meet the directive’s objectives.
We support the Commission’s initiative to develop guidelines and supporting mechanisms for SMEs that are affected along supply chains. These guidelines will need to be targeted and clear. We expect the Commission to follow the implementation procedure closely and keep up the dialogue with those affected to ensure supporting mechanisms correspond to their needs.
We believe that fighting climate change requires radical measures and incentives. Therefore, we stand behind the Commission’s proposal to connect directors’ remuneration with sustainability targets (Art 15.3). We all have a collective responsibility to meet the Paris agreement. Companies have an important role to play in this respect, however the parties to the Agreement – governments – have a prime responsibility.
20 May 2022
28 January 2022
8 February 2021
8 October 2020
5 July 2023
8 June 2023
1 June 2023
1 June 2023
16 May 2023
27 April 2023
26 April 2023
26 April 2023
26 April 2023
21 April 2023
19 April 2023
12 April 2023
4 April 2023
24 March 2023
20 March 2023
17 March 2023
3 March 2023
27 February 2023
24 February 2023
8 February 2023