Consultation response

18 April 2016

The Federation responds to IESBA's proposed revisions to safeguards in the Code – Phase 1

The Federation of European Accountants submitted its comments on the IESBA Exposure Draft Proposed Revisions Pertaining to Safeguards in the Code – Phase 1.

In its general comments, the Federation states that it would like to assess Phase 2 of this project, as well as the outcome of the other EDs currently under consultation, before expressing any final opinion on the overall impact of the proposed changes to the Code. Below are some of the key views expressed in the letter: 

  • By adding further requirements the Code becomes rules-based, leading invariably to a tick-box approach. Nevertheless, the Federation supports the increased prominence of the requirement to apply the conceptual framework.
  • The imposition of the “third party test” is intended to provide a basis for establishing a framework to ensure the objective and rigorous assessment for determining the need for further action. What is deemed to be a “reasonable and informed third party” is subjective and the reference to a “hypothetical person” only reinforces this approach without any benefit for the user.
  • Regarding the “acceptable level”, the proposed amendment introduces a different concept, making it unnecessarily more stringent. This amendment does not bring added value as it is not very instructive on how professional accountants would achieve the intended result. 
  • The proposed description of safeguards has to be assessed in conjunction with the other amendments introduced in this regard. Introducing the concept of effectiveness in the definition of safeguard is unnecessary as, by definition, the elimination of threats must always be effective.
  • We have strong concerns in relation to the removal of certain conditions, policies, and procedures as safeguards. This adds confusion to the process and makes it more difficult for SMPs to consider how to apply the safeguards approach.

Overall, the Federation believes that IESBA is proposing a very strict concept of safeguard, disregarding important practical implications.

Please refer to the complete comment letter below for more information. 

 

Related documents

FEE comment letter on IESBA Exposure Draft Proposed Revisions Pertaining to Safeguards in the Code – Phase 1 

IESBA Exposure Draft

Related content

Consultation responseIESBA’s consultation paper on professional skepticism – meeting public expectations

15 August 2018

Consultation responseIESBA’s Proposed Strategy and Work Plan 2019 – 2023

16 July 2018

Consultation responseIESBA’s fees questionnaire

1 March 2018

Consultation responseIESBA’s Exposure Draft proposed revisions to the Code pertaining to the offering and accepting of...

8 December 2017

Consultation responseIESBA Strategy Survey April 2017

1 August 2017

Consultation responseIESBA Proposed Application Material Relating to Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment

14 July 2017

Consultation responseIESBA Exposure Draft Improving the Structure of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants –...

24 May 2017

Consultation responseProposed Revisions to Clarify the Applicability of Provisions in Part C of the Extant Code...

24 April 2017

Consultation responseProposed Revisions Pertaining to Safeguards in the Code – Phase 2 and Related Conforming Amendments

24 April 2017

PublicationEthics: some views from young professional accountants

28 September 2016

Consultation responseConsultation response to European Commission on services passport

18 July 2016

Consultation responseFEE comments on proposed changes to the Ethics Code on the long association of personnel...

11 May 2016

Consultation responseThe Federation responds to IESBA's proposed revisions to the structure of the Code – Phase...

20 April 2016

Consultation responseThe Federation provides views on the IAESB's future strategy and priorities

3 March 2016

PublicationEuropean young accountancy professionals, let your voice be heard!

7 January 2016

Team memberNoémi Robert

1 November 2015

Consultation responseFEE comments on the NOCLAR IAASB’s Exposure Draft

15 October 2015

Consultation responseFEE comments on the IESBA Exposure Draft: “Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations”

11 September 2015

Press releaseFEE sheds light on the possible impact of TTIP on European professional accountants and auditors

8 June 2015

Consultation responseFEE comments on IESBA Exposure Draft

27 May 2015

Sign up for our newsletter